Financial Services Review Magazine Reports & Reviews (2)
Financial Services Review Magazine Contacts
If you know any contact information for Financial Services Review Magazine, help other victims by adding it!
Add new contacts
|
If you know any contact information for Financial Services Review Magazine, help other victims by adding it!
A Balanced Assessment of Financial Services Review Magazine
Pros:
Diverse Contributors: One notable aspect of Financial Services Review Magazine is its roster of industry leaders who contribute to its content. This diverse range of voices enriches the magazine's perspectives and ensures a broad coverage of topics relevant to the financial services sector.
Established Readership: With a substantial readership and subscriber base, the magazine has evidently carved out a niche for itself within the financial services community. This wide reach speaks to the publication's ability to resonate with professionals seeking insights and updates in their field.
Advertising Opportunities: Financial Services Review Magazine provides advertising and advertorial services aimed at facilitating connections between businesses and their target audience. These services are purportedly cost-effective compared to alternatives, offering a platform for businesses to engage with potential clients.
Cons:
Selectivity in Advertising: While the magazine's discerning approach to advertising ensures the relevance and quality of content, it may limit opportunities for businesses whose offerings do not align with its editorial plan. This selectivity could potentially hinder access to the magazine's audience for some advertisers.
Response Time: Feedback from users indicates that the magazine's response time to inquiries may be slower than desired, averaging between 2 to 4 working days. This delay could be perceived as a drawback for individuals seeking prompt assistance or collaboration opportunities.
In summary, Financial Services Review Magazine presents itself as a valuable resource within the financial services industry, offering diverse insights and facilitating connections among professionals. Its strengths lie in its distinguished contributors and established readership, while its advertising services provide a platform for businesses to engage with their target audience. However, the magazine's selectivity in advertising and response time may pose challenges for some users. Ultimately, while Financial Services Review Magazine has much to offer, users should consider these factors when engaging with the publication.
Type of a scam Vanity Award Scam
- Exceptionally low Alexa rank, meaning they have little to no traffic to their website and practically no engagement.
- Domain and registration is hidden.
- Invasive advertising.
- Content either fake or plagiarized; even some people’s headshot photos are photoshopped.
- Falsely claim to have partnerships and attend partner conferences – simply hyperlink to actual conference (and they do that to drive their search ranking).
- No disclaimer, privacy, or cookie policy, and yet the website uses cookies, asking the user to accept and provide the site with cookies.
- Not a single “contributor” - publishing firms, such as magazines, always have at least a page about who the writers are and their information. The “contributors” are other people (i.e. Gary Watts, VP of Wealth Enhancement Group in CA) that don’t even work for the magazine.
They are also not listed on BBB.